← All charts for ContentWriters
Quality · ContentWriters
Profile completeness vs the type
We have 47% of what we track for ContentWriters, against an average of 57% for writing marketplaces.
What this shows
How much of the listing is filled in, by group. The bar is ContentWriters; the amber tick is the average for its peers. The table lists every field and whether we have it.
How it is calculated
profile_completeness(): 17 things we track for every platform, weighted by how much they matter to a decision (fees, join rules, countries, real earnings and the overview count 3; minimum payout, payout speed and withdrawal methods 2; the rest 1). A field counts once any of its columns has a value. Group percentages are weighted the same way.
Data table 17 rows
| Field | Group | Weight | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plain-English overview | Basics | 3 | Missing |
| What kind of platform it is | Basics | 1 | Have it |
| Year founded | Basics | 1 | Have it |
| Headquarters | Basics | 1 | Have it |
| Fees | Money | 3 | Have it |
| Minimum payout | Money | 2 | Missing |
| How fast you get paid | Money | 2 | Missing |
| Withdrawal methods | Money | 2 | Have it |
| Payment protection | Money | 1 | Missing |
| Join requirements | Joining | 3 | Have it |
| Countries it accepts | Joining | 3 | Have it |
| Real earnings figures | Earnings | 3 | Missing |
| Review ratings | Trust | 1 | Missing |
| Wikipedia or reference page | Trust | 1 | Missing |
| Support channels | Trust | 1 | Missing |
| Mobile apps | Trust | 1 | Missing |
| Social accounts | Trust | 1 | Missing |