← All charts for Landing.jobs
Quality · Landing.jobs

Profile completeness vs the type

We have 33% of what we track for Landing.jobs, against an average of 40% for remote job boards.

What this shows

How much of the listing is filled in, by group. The bar is Landing.jobs; the amber tick is the average for its peers. The table lists every field and whether we have it.

How it is calculated

profile_completeness(): 17 things we track for every platform, weighted by how much they matter to a decision (fees, join rules, countries, real earnings and the overview count 3; minimum payout, payout speed and withdrawal methods 2; the rest 1). A field counts once any of its columns has a value. Group percentages are weighted the same way.

Data table 17 rows
Landing.jobs: Profile completeness vs the type
FieldGroupWeightStatus
Plain-English overviewBasics3Have it
What kind of platform it isBasics1Have it
Year foundedBasics1Missing
HeadquartersBasics1Missing
FeesMoney3Have it
Minimum payoutMoney2Missing
How fast you get paidMoney2Missing
Withdrawal methodsMoney2Missing
Payment protectionMoney1Missing
Join requirementsJoining3Missing
Countries it acceptsJoining3Have it
Real earnings figuresEarnings3Missing
Review ratingsTrust1Missing
Wikipedia or reference pageTrust1Missing
Support channelsTrust1Missing
Mobile appsTrust1Missing
Social accountsTrust1Missing

Sources

Other charts for Landing.jobs